The point of departure for the selection of texts in this reader is the social dimension of participation – rather than activation of the individual viewer in so-called “interactive” art and installation. The latter trajectory has been well rehearsed elsewhere: the explosion of new technologies and the breakdown of medium-specific art in the 1960s provided myriad opportunities for physically engaging the viewer in a work of art.
pdf

Participation (2006), by Claire Bishop


, , , , , ,
Saturday, April 28th, 2012



How does a rethinking of Richard Serra’s Verb List relate to the Post‐Internet use of forms? Taking one selected verb from each column of Serra’s original list we find: To Open [...] To Collect [...] To Expand [...] To Continue. Drawn from a list of more than one hundred proposed actions, these four terms speak directly to our cultural situation.
p
pdf

Richard Serra’s Verb List, Post-Internet Appropriation, and the Culture of the Use of Forms (2011), by Brandon Bauer


, , , , , ,
Tuesday, April 17th, 2012



Since its beginnings in the late 90s, internet art has had a fickle relationship with the museum. While commissions and granting initiatives have been established for media arts in Europe and America, the relationship between internet art and its fluctuating appearance in institutions demonstrates that it has not yet been wholly embraced by mainstream contemporary art.
pdf

From Browser to Gallery (and Back): The Commodification of Net Art 1990-2011 (2011), by Jennifer Chan


, , , , , ,
Tuesday, April 17th, 2012



The work of the curator consists of placing artworks in the exhibition space. This is what differentiates the curator from the artist, as the artist has the privilege to exhibit objects which have not already been elevated to the status of artworks. In this case they gain this status precisely through being placed in the exhibition space. Duchamp, in exhibiting the urinal, is not a curator but an artist, because as a result of his decision to present the urinal in the framework of an exhibition, this urinal has become a work of art.
pdf

On the Curatorship (2008), by Boris Groys


, , , ,
Monday, March 19th, 2012



Museums, like asylums and jails, have wards and cells – in other words, neutral rooms called “galleries.” A work of art when placed in a gallery loses its charge, and becomes a portable object or surface disengaged from the outside world. A vacant white room with lights is still a submission to the neutral. Works of art seen in such spaces seem to be going through a kind of esthetic convalescence. They are looked upon as so many inanimate invalids, waiting for critics to pronounce them curable or incurable. The function of the warden-curator is to separate art from the rest of society. Next comes integration. Once the work of art is totally neutralized, ineffective, abstracted, safe, and politically lobotomized it is ready to be consumed by society.
pdf

Cultural Confinement (1972), by Robert Smithson


, , , , ,
Monday, March 19th, 2012



The scan is an ambivalent image. It oscillates back and forth: between a physical page and a digital file, between one reader and another, between an economy of objects and an economy of data. Scans are failures in terms of quality, neither as “readable” as the original book nor the inevitable ebook, always containing too much visual information or too little.
pdf

The Scan and the Export (2010), by Sean Dockray


, , , , , ,
Saturday, March 17th, 2012



In continuing this written monologue about conversation, I am becoming aware of the sheer weirdness of thinking in this way about something that behaves so differently than writing “for the record.” But if, as Maurice Blanchot demonstrates, conversation can be defined as a series of interruptions—perhaps the most powerful of which being the neutrality of silence—then writing, which is a kind of silent speech, may itself constitute an interruption to the way conversation is imagined.
pdf

Art of Conversation, Part II (2009), by Monika Szewczyk


, , , ,
Sunday, January 15th, 2012



Much has been said of late about “the conversational” or “the discursive” in and around the field of contemporary art. And yet we seem reluctant to talk about an art of conversation in the same breath. Maybe it is the all-too-powdery whiff of seventeenth-century aristocratic ladies and gentlemen, fanning themselves amidst idle chatter, whose connections to our own aspirations we would rather sweep under the shaggy carpet?2 Or perhaps it is because we are desperately hoping to talk ourselves out of stale notions of art as a cultural practice that to suggest an art of conversation might at first seem utterly oxymoronic?
pdf

Art of Conversation, Part I (2009), by Monika Szewczyk


, , , ,
Sunday, January 15th, 2012